Wager Mage
Photo: RODNAE Productions
“I'd say it's probably 65%-70% of punters that get factored where it's definitely the right decision.” One ex-Paddy Power employee showed the Guardian a menu of stake factors that suggest the company was more than happy to restrict people who were simply canny.
Training diet for jockeys Jockeys should try to eat three meals per day with foods from each of the food groups; breads and cereals, fruit,...
Read More »
Explanation of Three Pair Hands in poker are typically constructed with 5 cards, so making 3 sets of pairs (6 cards) is technically impossible. Jun...
Read More »On any given Saturday, Rory would spend several hours glued to a screen flickering with hundreds of football and horse racing bets placed by customers of the Irish bookmaker Paddy Power. One of multiple insiders from firms including Paddy Power Betfair, Ladbrokes and William Hill who spoke on condition of anonymity, Rory was part of an obscure corner of the gambling industry that exists to maximise profits by clamping down on successful punters. “The volume of customers they had, you could afford to get rid of anyone you thought wasn’t going to be profitable,” he said. Punters know the house usually wins, but most have no idea that bookies sharpen their edge via something called “stake factoring”, the process by which winning customers are dialled down, while losers are allowed to bet more. It works like this: when a customer opens an account, they might be given a stake factor of 1, meaning they can bet 100% of the normal maximum stake, for example £500. “As soon as people start winning or losing, that gets adjusted,” said Cameron, formerly of William Hill. “It starts with 50% and if they keep doing it [beating the bookie], it’ll keep going down. At William Hill it went down to 25% to 10% and eventually down to 1%.”
Betting on both teams (also called arbitrage betting or middling) can result in the bettor making a profit — regardless of the outcome — by placing...
Read More »
Billy Walters Net Worth: $200 Million He also gets the privilege of being considered one of the most successful professional sports bettors in Las...
Read More »There is, too, always the risk of the stablehand or kit man with inside knowledge of a lame horse or a star striker with a tummy bug. Other areas, though, are less clear cut. Some insiders complain of “bonus abusers”: people who milk the offers that companies send out to lure in new gamblers. Much more common are the “arbers” or arbitrage gamblers, who scour gambling websites for obviously wrong odds. By identifying an event where the odds are clearly priced wrongly, arbers can place a conflicting bet with another operator and make a return regardless of the result. The practice can even be automated by using bots to place multiple small wagers, flying under the radar of systems designed to spot the practice. However, some traders fear that bookies have become trigger-happy, targeting not just cheats but canny operators, known in the trade as “warm” or “shrewd” punters, or simply as “bad business”. “It tends to happen now that everyone that beats the price gets put under the ‘arber’ banner, which is unfair,” said Fintan, who has worked at multiple operators including Ladbrokes. “I’d say it’s probably 65%-70% of punters that get factored where it’s definitely the right decision.” One ex-Paddy Power employee showed the Guardian a menu of stake factors that suggest the company was more than happy to restrict people who were simply canny. New customers were set at 1.0, the document said, unprofitable customers at 0.3, and “warm” customers at 0.1. “The people running these businesses are answering to shareholders,” said Connor, who works in the gambling industry. “The guys in the trading room didn’t want to be answering on a Monday morning why they didn’t close an account that was winning.” One gambler, Bernard Henry, shared the results of a demand sent to Coral to see what data it held on him, known as a subject access request. It showed he had won just £38 over four years but had been prevented from placing sports bets after the bookie realised he had beaten their odds 73% of the time. He was still allowed to bet on casino products where the house never loses over time. Henry believes bookmakers shared data about him with other operators, via software that companies are permitted to use which is intended to prevent fraud but might also be used to shut down a smart better.
Our Top #5 Safest Online Casinos Las Atlantis – Regularly Audited. Las Atlantis is our no. ... Wild Casino – Offers Highest Withdrawal Limits. ......
Read More »
Five-eighth or Stand-off is one of the positions in a rugby league football team. Wearing jersey number 6, this player is one of the two half backs...
Read More »Everyone the Guardian spoke to said accounts were rarely closed completely, for good reason. According to Paddy Power’s manual, “warm” customers are “of use to us as marks”, meaning they are worth monitoring to assess if your prices are wrong. Even arbers, seen as cheats in the industry, would be set at a factor of 0.01. One former employee of Betfair believes this is about satisfying City investors, who see customer numbers as one measurement of success. “If they close all the bad customers, you go from 50,000 active users to 10,000,” he said. The flipside of factoring down winners is that losers have, over the years, been given more leeway to place ever bigger bets. The biggest stake factor Rory recalled a customer being allotted was 40. “He’s allowed to lose 40 times what anyone else was and it was astronomical what he was punting. There was no conscience to it.” In response, Paddy Power said its safer gambling checks would always override stake-factoring decisions. All of the sources who spoke to the Guardian said stake factoring was increasingly automated at the more tech-savvy companies. This, they said, meant there should be fewer arbitrary decisions made by bookies playing it safe. But Brian Chappell, founder of Justice for Punters, said he did not trust the industry to do right by its customers and feared unintended consequences. “Following intrusive, secretive profiling, only losing customers are allowed to choose how much they bet,” he said. “This is facilitating an unsafe and unfair UK sports betting market where unprofitable customers are more likely to consider the black market.” A spokesperson for Paddy Power owner Flutter said stake factoring was “common practice across the industry” but that it did not wish to restrict customers unfairly. They said the practice was “also critical in protecting the integrity of sporting events where we believe a customer placing bets has inside information”. None of the other gambling companies contacted by the Guardian returned a request for comment.
9-2 Betting Odds means that out of 11 possible outcomes, the 9/2 odds are that there will be 9 of one kind of outcome and 2 of another kind of...
Read More »
5 Tips To Become a Bookie: Learn about the business from blogs and experienced people like other bookies. Find players from bars, sports clubs,...
Read More »
'Duck' in this context originates as what is called a 'hypercoristic' term. This is where you apply the name of a domestic or endearing animal to a...
Read More »
To place a bet on the favored Giants means they must win by at least 10 points to cover the spread. The underdog Jets can lose by eight points and...
Read More »