Wager Mage
Photo: Anna Shvets
Conventionally, p < 0.05 is referred as statistically significant and p < 0.001 as statistically highly significant.
Like most aspects of human behavior and cognition, intelligence is a complex trait that is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors....
Read More »
Countries with the Lowest-Ranked Educational Systems (and their estimated adult literacy rates) Niger (28.7%) Burkina Faso (28.7%) Mali (31.1%)...
Read More »
"1000 percent" or "1000%" in a literal sense means to multiply by 10. In American English it is used as a metaphor meaning very high emphasis, or...
Read More »
The first option (Rule 26-1a) allows you to drop a ball from where you last played and try it again from there. Sometimes it may be a good option,...
Read More »One should keep in mind the difference between statistical significance and clinical significance. The results of a study can be statistically significant but still be too small to be of any practical value. We might encounter a situation where new treatment shows reduction in pain as statistically significant with a p value of 0.0001. The extremely low p value in this situation indicates that we are really sure that the results are not accidental-- the improvement is really due to the treatment and not just chance. However, it is important to note the magnitude of improvement while interpreting it clinically. Usually, the extremes are easy to recognize and agree upon. If with the new treatment being investigated, patients get 90% pain relief, we can all agree that this is an effective, worthwhile treatment. But if reduction in pain is just 3%, such a paltry effect may not be of any importance. It is thus important to decide whether the observed treatment effect is large enough to make a difference. But what would constitute the smallest amount of improvement (say δ) that would be considered worthwhile. After all we want the new treatment to make a difference. This is tricky. The researchers doing the study should explicitly state what this minimal amount of clinically important improvement is. One can find the absolute amount of improvement in critical outcome measure, to decide if the improvement looked very large and can cross reference it with other sources to decide whether it met the Medically Important Clinical Difference (MICD). The null and alternative hypothesis could be appropriately framed to detect the Medically Important Clinical Difference as significant.
It's true, though, that you may make real money online by playing games on legitimate websites and programs. In addition, if you play online games...
Read More »
In fact, the value 16 is said to be the worst hand one can have in blackjack. Since sixteen of the other fifty cards have a value of 10 and four...
Read More »
From Marianne Bachmeier, the German mother who killed her daughter's murderer, to Jason Vukovich, the Alaskan man who beat up sex offenders, these...
Read More »
golden ratio golden ratio, also known as the golden section, golden mean, or divine proportion, in mathematics, the irrational number (1 + Square...
Read More »